No Sunglasses

Alternate blog for There Are No Sunglasses: therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com

Thursday, November 2, 2023

UN High Human Rights Commissioner Resigns To Protest Genocide In Palestine


 https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2023/11/02/un-high-human-rights-commissioner-resigns-to-protest-genocide-in-palestine/

Resignation letter from the Director of New York Office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights

 
 

The Director of the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, Craig Mokhiber, resigns submitting the most damning letter of resignation.

To Volker Turk, High Commissioner for Human Rights

 

Dear High Commissioner,

This will be my last official communication to you as Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

I write at a moment of great anguish for the world, including for many of our colleagues. Once again, we are seeing a genocide unfolding before our eyes, and the Organization that we serve appears powerless to stop it. As someone who has investigated human rights in Palestine since the 1980s, lived in Gaza as a UN human rights advisor in the 1990s, and carried out several human rights missions to the country before and since, this is deeply personal to me.

I also worked in these halls through the genocides against the Tutsis, Bosnian Muslims, the Yazidi, and the Rohingya. In each case, when the dust settled on the horrors that had been perpetrated against defenseless civilian populations, it became painfully clear that we had failed in our duty to meet the imperatives of prevention of mass atrocites, of protection of the vulnerable, and of accountability for perpetrators. And so it has been with successive waves of murder and persecution against the Palestinians throughout the entire life of the UN.

High Commissioner, we are failing again.

As a human rights lawyer with more than three decades of experience in the field, I know well that the concept of genocide has often been subject to political abuse. But the current wholesale slaughter of the Palestinian people, rooted in an ethno-nationalist settler colonial ideology, in continuation of decades of their systematic persecution and purging, based entirely upon their status as Arabs, and coupled with explicit statements of intent by leaders in the Israeli government and military, leaves no room for doubt or debate. In Gaza, civilian homes, schools, churches, mosques, and medical institutions are wantonly attacked as thousands of civilians are massacred. In the West Bank, including occupied Jerusalem, homes are seized and reassigned based entirely on race, and violent settler pogroms are accompanied by Israeli military units. Across the land, Apartheid rules.

This is a text-book case of genocide. The European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project in Palestine has entered its final phase, toward the expedited destruction of the last remnants of indigenous Palestinian life in Palestine. What’s more, the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, and much of Europe, are wholly complicit in the horrific assault. Not only are these governments refusing to meet their treaty obligations “to ensure respect” for the Geneva Conventions, but they are in fact actively arming the assault, providing economic and intelligence support, and giving political and diplomatic cover for Israel’s atrocities.

In concert with this, western corporate media, increasingly captured and state-adjacent, are in open breach of Article 20 of the ICCPR, continuously dehumanizing Palestinians to facilitate the genocide, and broadcasting propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, and violence. US-based social media companies are suppressing the voices of human rights defenders while amplifying pro-Israel propaganda. Israel lobby online-trolls and GONGOS are harassing and smearing human rights defenders, and western universities and employers are collaborating with them to punish those who dare to speak out against the atrocities. In the wake of this genocide, there must be an accounting for these actors as well, just as there was for radio Milles Collines in Rwanda.

In such circumstances, the demands on our organization for principled and effective action are greater than ever. But we have not met the challenge. The protective enforcement power Security Council has again been blocked by US intransigence, the SG is under assault for the mildest of protestations, and our human rights mechanisms are under sustained slanderous attack by an organized, online impunity network.

Decades of distraction by the illusory and largely disingenuous promises of Oslo have diverted the Organization from its core duty to defend international law, international human rights, and the Charter itself. The mantra of the “two-state solution” has become an open joke in the corridors of the UN, both for its utter impossibility in fact, and for its total failure to account for the inalienable human rights of the Palestinian people. The so-called “Quartet” has become nothing more than a fig leaf for inaction and for subservience to a brutal status quo. The (US-scripted) deference to “agreements between the parties themselves” (in place of international law) was always a transparent slight-of-hand, designed to reinforce the power of Israel over the rights of the occupied and dispossessed Palestinians.

High Commissioner, I came to this Organization first in the 1980s, because I found in it a principled, normbased institution that was squarely on the side of human rights, including in cases where the powerful US, UK, and Europe were not on our side. While my own government, its subsidiarity institutions, and much of the US media were still supporting or justifying South African apartheid, Israeli oppression, and Central American death squads, the UN was standing up for the oppressed peoples of those lands. We had international law on our side. We had human rights on our side. We had principle on our side. Our authority was rooted in our integrity. But no more.

In recent decades, key parts of the UN have surrendered to the power of the US, and to fear of the Israel Lobby, to abandon these principles, and to retreat from international law itself. We have lost a lot in this abandonment, not least our own global credibility. But the Palestinian people have sustained the biggest losses as a result of our failures. It is a stunning historic irony that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in the same year that the Nakba was perpetrated against the Palestinian people. As we commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the UDHR, we would do well to abandon the old cliché that the UDHR was born out of the atrocities that proceeded it, and to admit that it was born alongside one of the most atrocious genocides of the 20th Century, that of the destruction of Palestine. In some sense, the framers were promising human rights to everyone, except the Palestinian people. And let us remember as well, that the UN itself carries the original sin of helping to facilitate the dispossession of the Palestinian people by ratifying the European settler colonial project that seized Palestinian land and turned it over to the colonists. We have much for which to atone.

But the path to atonement is clear. We have much to learn from the principled stance taken in cities around the world in recent days, as masses of people stand up against the genocide, even at risk of beatings and arrest. Palestinians and their allies, human rights defenders of every stripe, Christian and Muslim organizations, and progressive Jewish voices saying “not in our name”, are all leading the way. All we have to do is to follow them.

Yesterday, just a few blocks from here, New York’s Grand Central Station was completely taken over by thousands of Jewish human rights defenders standing in solidarity with the Palestinian people and demanding an end to Israeli tyranny (many risking arrest, in the process). In doing so, they stripped away in an instant the Israeli hasbara propaganda point (and old antisemitic trope) that Israel somehow represents the Jewish people. It does not. And, as such, Israel is solely responsible for its crimes. On this point, it bears repeating, in spite of Israel lobby smears to the contrary, that criticism of Israel’s human rights violations is not antisemitic, any more than criticism of Saudi violations is Islamophobic, criticism of Myanmar violations is anti-Buddhist, or criticism of Indian violations is anti-Hindu. When they seek to silence us with smears, we must raise our voice, not lower it. I trust you will agree, High Commissioner, that this is what speaking truth to power is all about.

But I also find hope in those parts of the UN that have refused to compromise the Organization’s human rights principles in spite of enormous pressures to do so. Our independent special rapporteurs, commissions of enquiry, and treaty body experts, alongside most of our staff, have continued to stand up for the human rights of the Palestinian people, even as other parts of the UN (even at the highest levels) have shamefully bowed their heads to power. As the custodians of the human rights norms and standards, OHCHR has a particular duty to defend those standards. Our job, I believe, is to make our voice heard, from the Secretary General to the newest UN recruit, and horizontally across the wider UN system, insisting that the human rights of the Palestinian people are not up for debate, negotiation, or compromise anywhere under the blue flag.

What, then, would a UN-norm-based position look like? For what would we work if we were true to our rhetorical admonitions about human rights and equality for all, accountability for perpetrators, redress for victims, protection of the vulnerable, and empowerment for rights-holders, all under the rule of law? The answer, I believe, is simple—if we have the clarity to see beyond the propagandistic smokescreens that distort the vision of justice to which we are sworn, the courage to abandon fear and deference to powerful states, and the will to truly take up the banner of human rights and peace. To be sure, this is a long-term project and a steep climb. But we must begin now or surrender to unspeakable horror. I see ten essential points:

  1. Legitimate action: First, we in the UN must abandon the failed (and largely disingenuous) Oslo paradigm, its illusory two-state solution, its impotent and complicit Quartet, and its subjugation of international law to the dictates of presumed political expediency. Our positions must be unapologetically based on international human rights and international law.
  2. Clarity of Vision: We must stop the pretense that this is simply a conflict over land or religion between two warring parties and admit the reality of the situation in which a disproportionately powerful state is colonizing, persecuting, and dispossessing an indigenous population on the basis of their ethnicity.
  3. One State based on human rights: We must support the establishment of a single, democratic, secular state in all of historic Palestine, with equal rights for Christians, Muslims, and Jews, and, therefore, the dismantling of the deeply racist, settler-colonial project and an end to apartheid across the land.
  4. Fighting Apartheid: We must redirect all UN efforts and resources to the struggle against apartheid, just as we did for South Africa in the 1970s, 80s, and early 90s.
  5. Return and Compensation: We must reaffirm and insist on the right to return and full compensation for all Palestinians and their families currently living in the occupied territories, in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and in the diaspora across the globe.
  6. Truth and Justice: We must call for a transitional justice process, making full use of decades of accumulated UN investigations, enquiries, and reports, to document the truth, and to ensure accountability for all perpetrators, redress for all victims, and remedies for documented injustices.
  7. Protection: We must press for the deployment of a well-resourced and strongly mandated UN protection force with a sustained mandate to protect civilians from the river to the sea.
  8. Disarmament: We must advocate for the removal and destruction of Israel’s massive stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, lest the conflict lead to the total destruction of the region and, possibly, beyond.
  9. Mediation: We must recognize that the US and other western powers are in fact not credible mediators, but rather actual parties to the conflict who are complicit with Israel in the violation of Palestinian rights, and we must engage them as such.
  10. Solidarity: We must open our doors (and the doors of the SG) wide to the legions of Palestinian, Israeli, Jewish, Muslim, and Christian human rights defenders who are standing in solidarity with the people of Palestine and their human rights and stop the unconstrained flow of Israel lobbyists to the offices of UN leaders, where they advocate for continued war, persecution, apartheid, and impunity, and smear our human rights defenders for their principled defense of Palestinian rights.

This will take years to achieve, and western powers will fight us every step of the way, so we must be steadfast. In the immediate term, we must work for an immediate ceasefire and an end to the longstanding siege on Gaza, stand up against the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, Jerusalem, and the West Bank (and elsewhere), document the genocidal assault in Gaza, help to bring massive humanitarian aid and reconstruction to the Palestinians, take care of our traumatized colleagues and their families, and fight like hell for a principled approach in the UN’s political offices.

The UN’s failure in Palestine thus far is not a reason for us to withdraw. Rather it should give us the courage to abandon the failed paradigm of the past, and fully embrace a more principled course. Let us, as OHCHR, boldly and proudly join the anti-apartheid movement that is growing all around the world, adding our logo to the banner of equality and human rights for the Palestinian people. The world is watching. We will all be accountable for where we stood at this crucial moment in history. Let us stand on the side of justice.

I thank you, High Commissioner, Volker, for hearing this final appeal from my desk. I will leave the Office in a few days for the last time, after more than three decades of service. But please do not hesitate to reach out if I can be of assistance in the future.

Craig Mokhiber

Thursday, October 19, 2023

The World Demands "Human Rights" For the "People" of Palestine

 https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2023/10/19/the-world-demands-human-rights-for-the-people-of-palestine/

 

Israel calls Palestinians ‘human animals,’ denies Gaza civilians food and water amid mass bombing

Memoirs of a Palestinian 'human animal' from Gaza

[SEE: Amid Israel-Hamas war, pro-Palestine protesters flood US, Europe streets | Photos]

Israeli Embassies

See also: Foreign Embassies in Israel

 

Diplomatic Representation in U.S.

Ambassador: Sallai MERIDOR

Embassy:3514 International Drive NW, Washington DC, 20008

Telephone: 202-364-5500

FAX: 202-364-3607

Consulates General are in:
Los Angeles
6380 Wilshire Bl., Suite 1700,
Los Angeles, CA 90048.
PH: (213) 852-5500

San Francisco

456 Montgomery St., Suite 2100,
San Francisco, CA 94104.
PH: ( 415)-844-7500
Fax: ( 415)-844-7555

Miami

100 N. Biscayne Bl., Suite 1800,
Miami, FL 33132.
PH: (305) 358-8111

Atlanta

1100 Spring St., NW, Suite 440,
Atlanta, GA 30309
PH: (404) 875-7851

Chicago
111 E. Wacker Dr., 13th Floor,
Chicago, IL 60601.
PH: (312) 565-3300

Boston

Statler Office Bldg., 20 Park Pz., Suite 1020,
Boston, MA 02116.
PH: (617) 542-0041

New York

800 2nd Av., 13,14,15 Floor,
New York, NY 10017.
PH: (212) 499-5400

Philadelphia

230 S. 15th St., 8th Floor,
Philadelphia, PA 19102.
PH: (215) 546-5556

Houston
Weslayan Tower, 24 Greenway Pz., Suite 1500,
Houston, TX 77046.
PH:(713) 627-3780
Fax (713) 627-0149

Consulate General

800 2nd Ave
New York, NY 10017

**************************

Embassy of Israel in Luanda, Angola:

Rua Rainha Ngina 34 Edificio Siccalluanda,
Tel.: 244 -2-331501, 244-2-395295, 244-2-397331,
Fax: 244-2-396366,
e-mail: info@luanda.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Buenos Aires, Argentina:

Av. de mayo 701, piso 10, Buenos Aires,
Tel: 54 -11-43382500,
Fax: 54 -11-43382555,
E-mail: info@buenosaires.mfa.gov.il

Honorary Consulate of Israel in Mendoza, Argentina - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Canberra, Australia:

6 Turrana St. Yarralumla, Act. 2600 Canberra,
Tel.: 61-2-62731309/0, 61-2-62733541,
Fax: 61-2-62734273,
E-mail: info@canberra.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Vienna, Austria:

20 Anton Frank Gasse, 1180 Vienna,
Tel.: 43-1-47646500, 43-1-47646510,
Fax: 43-1-47646555,
E-mail: info@vienna.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Baku, Azerbaijan:

Hyatt Tower 3, 7th floor, Izmir Street, 1033 Baku,
Tel.: 994 -12-907881/2,
Fax: 994 -12-907892,
E-mail: info@baku.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Brussels, Belgium:

Av. De l'Observatoire 40, 1180 Brussels (EU),
Tel.: 32 -2-3735500,
Fax: 32 -2-3735677,
E-mail: info@brussels.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in La Paz, Bolivia:

Av. Maruscal Sta Cruz 2150 Piso 10 Edificio Esperanza, La Paz,
Tel.: 591 -22-391126,
Fax: 591 -22-391712,
E-mail: info@lapaz.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Brazilia, Brasil:

S.E.S. Av. Das Nacoes Lote 38, Q 809 Brazilia CEP 704 24 900,
Tel.: 55 -61-2447675,
Fax: 55 -61-2446129,
E-mail: info@brasilia.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Sofia, Bulgaria:

1 Bulgaria SQ, NDK Administration Building, 7th Floor Sofia,
Tel.: 359 -2-9515044,
Fax: 359 -2-9521101,
E-mail: info@sofia.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Yaounde, Cameroon:

P.O. Box 5934 Yaounde,
Tel.: 237 --2201644, 237 --2211291, 237 --2219397,
Fax: 237 -2210823,
E-mail: info@yaounde.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Ottawa, Canada:

50 O'Connor Street Suite 1005 Ontario K1P6L2 Ottawa,
Tel.: 1 -613-5676450,
Fax: 1 -613-2378865,
E-mail: info@ottawa.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Santiago, Chile:

San Sebastian 1812 Santiago de Chile,
Tel.: 56 -2-7500500,
Fax: 56 -2-7500555
E-mail: info@santiago.mfa.gov.il

Israel Economic and Cultural Office in Taipei, China (Republic) - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Bogota, Colombia:

Edificio Caxdac Cale 35, No 7-25, Piso 14, Bogota,
Tel.: 57-1-2884637/4732, 57-1-2884701/4778,
57-1-2884707, 57-1-2884738/4776,
Fax: 57-1-2877783,
E-mail: info@bogota.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of israel in San Jose, Costa Rica:

Edificio Centro Colon, Paseo Colon, Calle 38, San Jose,
Tel.: 506 --2218447, 506 --2216011/6444,
Fax: 506 --2570867,
E-mail: info@sanjose.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Abidjan, Cote d`Ivoire:

01 B.P. 1877, Abidjan 01 Abidjan,
Tel.: 225 --20212955, 225 --20214953, 225 --20227191/2/3,
Fax: 225 --20218704,
E-mail: info@abidjan.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Nicosia, Cyprus:

4 Gripari Street, P.O.B. 25159 Nicosia,
Tel.: 357-22-369500,
Fax: 357 22-663486
E-mail: info@nicosia.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Prague, Czech Republic:

Badeniho 2, 17000 Prague 7,
Tel.: 420 -2- 3309 7500/1,
Fax: 420 -2-33097529
E-mail: info@prague.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Copenhagen, Denmark:

Lundeb Angsvej 4, 2900 Hellerup, Copenhagen,
Tel.: 45 --88185500,
Fax: 45 - 88185555
E-mail: info@copenhagen.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic:

Pedro Henriquez Urena 80, Santo Domingo,
Tel.: 1 -809-4720774/5/6,
Fax: 1 -809-4721785,
E-mail: info@santodomingo.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Quito, Ecuador:

12 de Octubre y Gral. Francisco Salazar Esq. Edif. Plaza 2000,
Piso 9 Quito,
Tel.: 593 -2-2237474,
Fax: 593 -2-2238055,
E-mail: info@quito.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Cairo, Egypt:

6 Sharia Ibn-El Maleck, Cairo,
Tel.: 20 -2-3610528, 20 -2-7610458, 20 -2-7610528/45,
Fax: 20 -2-7610414,
E-mail: info@cairo.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in San Salvador, El Salvador:

Centro Financiero Gigante, Torre B, Piso 63,
Avenida Sur y Alameda Roosevelt, San Salvador,
Tel.: 503 --2113434,
Fax: 503 --2113443,
E-mail: info@sansalvador.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Asmara, Eritrea:

32 Ogaden Street, P.O. Box 5600 Asmara,
Tel.: 291 -1-188521, 291 -1-188599, 291 -1-188626,
Fax: 291 -1-188550,
E-mail: info@asmara.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia:

P.O. Box 1266, Higher 16 Kebele 22 House No. 283, Addis Ababa,
Tel.: 251 -1-460999, 251 -1-461953,
Fax: 251 -1-461961,
E-mail: info@addisababa.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Helsinki, Finland:

00170 Helsinki 71 Vironkatu 5 A, Helsinki,
Tel.: 358 -9-6812020,
Fax: 358 -9-1356959,
E-mail: info@helsinki.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Paris, France - WEB-site

Israel Tourism Office in Paris, France - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Tibilisi, Georgia:

61 D Agmashenebeli A. Ve. Tibilisi, 0102 Tibilisi,
Tel.: 995 -32-942705, 995 -32-951709, 995 -32-964457,
Fax: 995 -32-237133,
E-mail: info@tbilisi.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Berlin, Germany - WEB-site

Israel Tourism Office in Frankfurt, Germany - WEB-site

Israel Trade Center in Munich, Germany - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in London, Great Britain and Northern Ireland - WEB-site

Israel Information Office in Glasgow, Great Britain and Northern Ireland - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Athens, Greece:

Marathonodromou Street 1 Paleo Psychico 15452 Athens,
Tel.: 30 -210-6719530, 30 -210-6719531, 30 -210-6722183,
Fax: 30 -210-6749510,
E-mail: info@athens.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Guatemala City, Guatemala:

13 Avenida 14-07 Zona 10, Guatemala City,
Tel.: 502 --3635665, 502 --3334624,
Fax: 502 --3336950,
E-mail: info@guatemala.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Holy See (Vatican):

Via Michele Mercati 12, 00197 Rome, Vatican,
Tel.: 39 -06-36198690/1/2,
Fax: 39 -06-36198626,
E-mail: info@vatholysee.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Budapest, Hungary:

Fullank Utca 8, 1026 Budapest,
Tel.: 36 -1-2000781, 36 -1-2000782,
Fax: 36 -1-2000783,
E-mail: info@budapest.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in New Dehli, India:

3 Aurngzeb Road, New Dehli,
Tel.: 91-11-23013238,
Fax: 91-11-23014298
E-mail: info@newdelhi.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Dublin, Ireland:

Carrisbrook House122, Pembroke Rodeballs Bridge Dublin,
Tel.: 353 -1-2309400,
Fax: 353 -1-2309446,
E-mail: info@dublin.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Rome, Italy - WEB-site

Indirizzo: Via Michele Mercati,14, 00197 Roma
tel: 06 36198500
Fax: 06 36198555
Orario di apertura Uffici Consolari: 09.00 12.00

Embassy of Israel in Tokyo, Japan:

3 Niban-Cho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo,
Tel.: 81 -3-32640911,
Fax: 81 -3-32640832,
E-mail: info@tokyo.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Amman, Jordan:

47 Maysaloun Street Rabiya,
P.O. Box 950866 Amman 11195, Jordan,
Tel.: 962 -6-5524680-8, 962 -6-5525170-5, 962 -6-5524689,
Fax: 962 -6-5525177,
E-mail: info@amman.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Almaty, Kazakhstan:

Dgeltoxan Street 87 Almaty
Tel.: 7-3272-506284, 7-3272-507215/6/7,
Fax: 7-3272-506283,
E-mail: info@almata.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Nairobi, Kenya:

Bishop Rode Nairobi, P.O. Box 30354 Nairobi,
Tel.: 254 -20-2710381, 254 -20-2711684,
254 -20-2716837, 254 -20-2722182/3, Fax: 254 -20-2715966,
E-mail: info@nairobi.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Riga, Latvia:

2 Elizabetes Street LV 1340 Riga,
Tel.: 371 --7320737/9, 371 --7323371,
Fax: 371 --7830170,
E-mail: info@rig.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Nouakchott, Mauritania:

Tevragh-Zeina Ilot-A-516 Nouakchott
Tel.: 222 --5254610, 222 --5258235,
Fax: 222 --5254612,
E-mail: info@nouakchott.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in MExico City, Mexico:

Sierra Madre No. 215, Lomas de Chapultepec 11000,
Mexico DF,
Tel.: 52-55-52011500,
Fax: 52-55-52011555,
E-mail: info@mexico.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Yangon, Myanmar:

15 `Khabaung St. Hlaing Township, Yangon
Tel.: 95 -1-515115,
Fax: 95 -1-515116,
E-mail: info@yangon.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Kathmandu, Nepal:

Bishramalaya House, Lazimpat Street, Kathmandu
Tel.: 977 -1-4411811, 977 -1-4419103,
Fax: 977 -1-4413920,
E-mail: info@kathmandu.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in The Hague, Netherlands - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Abuja, Nigeria:

Zone 4A, Asokoro, Abuja
Tel.: 234 -9-3143170,
Fax: 234 -9-3143177,
E-mail: info@abuja.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Oslo, Norway:

Parkveien 35, 0258 Oslo,
Tel.: 47 --21019500,
Fax: 47 --2101 9530,
E-mail: info@oslo.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Lima, Peru:

Natalio Sanchez No. 125, Piso 6, Santa Beatriz Lima
Tel.: 51 -1-43 34431,
Fax: 51 -1-4338925,
E-mail: info@lima.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Manila, Philippines:

23rd Floor, Trafalgar Plaza H.V.
De la Costa Street Salcedo Villamakati Metro Manila
Tel.: 63 -2-8925330/32, 63 -2-8940441/43,
Fax: 63 -2-8941027,
E-mail: info@manila.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Warsaw, Poland:

Ul. Krzywickiego 24, Warszawa 02-078 Warsaw
Tel.: 48 -22- 8250923, 48 -22-8252897
Fax: 48 -22-8251607,
E-mail: info@warsaw.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Lisbon, Portugal:

Rua Antonio Enes No. 16 Lisbon,
Tel.: 351 -21-3553640,
Fax: 351 -21-3553658
E-mail: info@lisbon.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Doha, Qatar:

56/11 IBN Al-Buhaturi St. P.O.B 22183 Doha,
Tel.: 974 --4689074, 974 --4689077,
Fax: 974 --4685258,
E-mail: info@doha.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Bucharest, Romania:

B-Dul Dimitrei Cantemir 1 Tronson 2+3 B2
Piata, Unirii, Bucharest,
Tel.: 40 -21-3304149/99
Fax: 40 -21-3300750,
E-mail: info@bucharest.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Moscow, Russian Federation:

Bolshaya Ordynka 56 P.O.Box 113095 Moscow
Tel.: 7-095-2306700
Fax: 7-095-2306768
E-mail: info@moscow.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Dakar, Senegal:

3 Place de L'Independance B.P., 2096 Dakar,
Tel.: 221 --8237965, 221 --8238355,
Fax: 221 --8236490,
E-mail: info@dakar.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro

Bulevar Mira 47, Dedinje Beograd, Belgrade,
Tel.: 381 -11-3672400, 381 -11-3672401, 381 -11-3672402,
Fax: 381 -11-3670304,
E-mail: info@belgrade.mfa.gov.il

Economic and Trade Department of the Embassy of Israel, Singapore - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Pretoria, South Africa:

339 Hilda St. Hatfield, Pretoria,
Tel.: 27 -12-3485288, 27 -12-3485512, 27 -12-3480256,
Fax: 27 -12-3484216,
E-mail: info@pretoria.mfa.gov.il

Israel Tourism Office in Seoul, South Korea - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Madrid, Spain - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Stockholm, Sweden:

Torstenssonsgatan 4, 11456
P.O. Box 14006, 10440 Stockholm,
Tel.: 46 -8-6630435,
Fax: 46 -8-6625301,
E-mail: info@stockholm.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Bern, Switzerland:

Alpenstrasse 32, 3006 Bern,
Tel.: 41 -31-3563500, 41 -31-3563501,
Fax: 41 -31-3563556,
E-mail: info@bern.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Taipei, Taiwan:

Suite 2408 24F, Intl. Trade Building No. 333,
Keelung Road, Sec. 1, Taipei,
Tel.: 886 -2-27579692,
Fax: 886 -2-27577247,
E-mail: info@taipei.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Bangkok, Thailand:

Ocean Tower II, 25th Floor, Sukumvit Soi 19 Bangkok 10110,
Tel.: 66 -2-2049200,
Fax: 66 -2-2049255,
E-mail: info@bangkok.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Ankara, Turkey:

SOK Mahatma Gandi 85 Ankara,
Tel.: 90 -312-4463605,
Fax: 90 -312-4468071,
E-mail: info@ankara.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Kiev, Ukraine:

G.P.E. - S Lesi Ukrainki 34252195 Kiev,
Tel.: 380-44-2948108, 380-44-2961731,
Fax: 380-44-2949748,
E-mail: info@kiev.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Washington, United States of America - WEB-site

Permanent Mission of Israel to the United Nations in New York - WEB-site

Embassy of Israel in Montevideo, Uruguay:

Boulevard Artigas 1585 Montevideo,
Tel.: 598 -2-4004164/5/6,
Fax: 598 -2-4095821,
E-mail: info@montevideo.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Tashkent, Uzbekistan:

3 A. Kahhar Street, Tashkent,
Tel.: 998 -71-1205808/9, 998 -71-1205810/1,
Fax: 998 -71-1205812,
E-mail: info@tashkent.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Caraca, Venezuela:

Avenida Francisco de Miranda Centro Empresarial de Miranda,
Ap. 4, Of. D, Los Ruices, 70081 Caracas,
Tel.: 58 -212-2394510/11,
Fax: 58 -212-2394320,
E-mail: info@caracas.mfa.gov.il

Embassy of Israel in Hanoi, Vietnam:

68 Nguyen Thai Hoc Hanoi
Tel.: 84 -4-8433140-3,
Fax: 84 -4-8435760,
E-mail: info@hanoi.mfa.gov.il

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Why Must Pro-Israel Mideast Wars Be Jump-Started With Initial Fabricated Reports of Mass-Murder of Babies?


https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2023/10/12/why-must-pro-israel-mideast-wars-be-jump-started-with-initial-fabricated-reports-of-mass-murder-of-babies/ 

[SEE: THE KUWAITI INCUBATOR HOAX]

"we investigated and then dismissed the obviously false tales of hundreds of babies thrown out of incubators by Iraqi troops."

What we actually know about the viral report of beheaded babies in Israel

One journalist from the Tel Aviv-based news channel i24 said a soldier told her they had "witnessed… bodies of babies with their heads cut off" at the Kfar Aza kibbutz near the Gaza border - but no Israeli officials have confirmed the claim.

 
Image:Garden equipment left abandoned after the attack on the Kfar Aza kibbutz

 

Reports that Israeli soldiers discovered babies that had been beheaded in the Kfar Aza kibbutz are circulating on social and traditional media outlets around the world.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) invited foreign journalists to see the aftermath of a massacre by Hamas militants at the kibbutz on Tuesday.

Sky's Stuart Ramsay was among those to go and see "stretcher-bearers bringing out a small child" and a basketball court with "bodies lined up in black body bags".

But in her TV reports, one journalist from the Tel Aviv-based news channel i24 said a soldier had told her they had "witnessed… bodies of babies with their heads cut off".

In a statement to Sky News, the IDF said: "We cannot confirm any numbers. What happened in Kibbutz Kfar Aza is a massacre in which women, children and toddlers and elderly were brutally butchered in an ISIS way of action."

 
 

Ramsay: 'They're going house-to-house looking for traps'

What happened at the kibbutz?

The Kfar Aza kibbutz is one of several self-contained Israeli settlements close to the Gaza border.

It is located between Netivot and Sderot around three miles from the border in southern Israel.

Because of its proximity to Gaza and the unprecedented nature of last weekend's incursion, which saw Hamas militants breach the usually-heavily-guarded border on foot - it was one of the first sites they reached on Saturday.

Four days later, journalists got to see the destruction left behind.

Chief correspondent Stuart Ramsay said the scene "can only be described as massacre".

"The stories here are shocking - families being woken without warning to voices outside their houses, mums and dads hiding their children in cupboards, wine cellars and basements, husbands and wives becoming separated in the fight," he says.

He adds that it took 17 hours for help to arrive, as the IDF focused on urban areas first - leaving residents defenceless and numbers of dead high.

Image:A property inside the Kibbutz
Image:Garden equipment left abandoned after the attack on the Kfar Aza kibbutz

 

Why are there reports of 'babies being beheaded'?

Claims Hamas fighters beheaded babies have only been reported by one journalist - Nicole Zedek from i24 - and have not been verified by Sky News.

Ms Zedek was among the reporters invited to see what was left at the kibbutz on Tuesday.

In one live broadcast, which has since been viewed millions of times on X, formerly known as Twitter, she says: "Talking to some of the soldiers here, they say what they witnessed as they've been walking through these communities is bodies of babies with their heads cut off and families gunned down in their beds.

"We can see some of these soldiers right now, comforting each other."

He says: "They cut off heads… of children, of women."

And in another live broadcast, Zedek describes "40 babies at least were taken out on gurneys" - which is where the widely shared 40 figure comes from.

In an interview with Sky's Mark Austin on Tuesday evening, Israeli economy minister Nir Barkat echoed a similar claim: "We've seen just now... we've heard of 40 young boys. Some of them were burned alive. Some were beheaded. Some were shot in the head."

CBS News in the US said on Wednesday that Yossi Landau, head of operations at Zaka, Israel's volunteer civilian emergency response organisation, confirmed to them he had "personally seen" adults, children and babies beheaded.

But when asked directly whether "40 babies were beheaded", an IDF spokesman said children were killed - but that reports of beheadings were "unconfirmed".

Israeli soldiers carry the body of a victim of an attack by militants from Gaza at Kibbutz Kfar Aza, in southern Israel, October 10, 2023. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
Image:Israeli soldiers carry body bags inside the kibbutz
Body bags inside the Kfar Aza kibbutz. Pic: AP
Image:Body bags inside the Kfar Aza kibbutz. Pic: AP

 

It was later reported by at least one major TV news network that the reports of babies being beheaded had been "confirmed" by a spokesperson for the Israeli prime minister's office.

This was subsequently attributed to Tal Heinrich, a freelance news anchor who appears to have been drafted in by Benjamin Netanyahu's office on 8 October to assist with media relations in the wake of Hamas's attacks a day earlier.

The only available public statement on the matter from Ms Heinrich at the time of writing was an interview she conducted with LBC on Wednesday, in which she was asked about the claims.

Ms Heinrich, who was quoted by LBC as a spokesperson for Mr Netanyahu's office, said: "Toddlers, babies, I can tell you some of them... yes, heads were cut off. This is what we are hearing from... soldiers on the ground who dealt with the bodies."

Replying to a later post on X linking to a story citing her comments, she said on Wednesday evening: "Please note: We said that these reports are based on testimonies of soldiers".

'Important to separate facts from speculation'

Stuart Ramsay interviewed two IDF majors - one of whom was a spokesman.

Ramsay said: "At no point did either he, or the other major I spoke to, ever mention that Hamas had beheaded or killed 40 babies or children. I believe that if it were the case, they would have told me and others there.

"There is no doubt that a horrific attack took place at Kfar Aza, and it needed to be reported, and we did see the bodies of the dead from the community in their houses, in the back of a truck, and on the basketball court.

"But it's important to separate the facts from speculation in a situation like this.

"To reiterate - the IDF had every opportunity to inform the world's media of any story that had become apparent as the military continue to clear up the kibbutz. The murder and beheading of 40 children was never mentioned to me or my team."

And another journalist, Oren Ziv, who works for independent news outlet 972 mag, was also present and given the opportunity to speak to "hundreds of soldiers on site".

In a post on X, he said of the baby claims: "During the tour we didn't see any evidence of this, and the army spokesperson or commanders also didn't mention any such incidents."

 
 

Adding to the confusion, the White House was forced into a remarkable climbdown on Wednesday night after President Biden appeared to confirm that he had seen pictures of children being beheaded in the Hamas attack.

In a speech to a Jewish community gathering in Washington, which was televised live, he said: "I never really thought that I would see, have confirmed, pictures of terrorists beheading children, I never thought I would ever, anyway..."

However, after Sky News' US partner NBC approached the White House for further details on President Biden's remarks, two senior administration officials said Biden was only referring to several media reports from Israel about beheaded children and had not seen images or had independent confirmation of child beheadings.

He had not in fact seen any images or had independent confirmation of child beheadings.

Digital investigations journalist Victoria Elms, who works on Sky's Data and Forensics unit, adds: "Social media has been awash with misinformation about the situation in Israel and Gaza since the war broke out.

"Videos from the Syrian conflict, excerpts from video games and TikToks made months ago have all been widely shared, falsely claiming to show events from the past few days."

She says that misinformation is often shared "unintentionally", but that "there are some who post and share false material with the intent to deceive others.

"This is especially dangerous during times of conflict, where it may be even harder than usual to independently verify information or footage.

"As the conflict draws on, we would urge users to be vigilant when consuming online content related to the war."

Tuesday, September 26, 2023

U.S. Naval Forces To Copy Chinese S. China Sea Tactics, Preparing Massive Landgrab of Southern Pacific Island Chains

 U.S. Naval Forces To Copy Chinese S. China Sea Tactics, Preparing Massive Landgrab of Southern Pacific Island Chains

  • Washington’s new pacts with three island states will establish a second island chain of attack as a complete sphere of influence in breach of international law and its own interpretation of freedom of navigation

If you are interested in world politics, the geopolitics of the Asia-Pacific, China and the United States, what’s the most enlightening source you have come across recently?

Well, let me share mine. But bear with me because you will probably roll your eyes and yawn. That was my reaction because the title itself put me half to sleep when an erudite source referenced it to me: “[US] Senate Energy Committee Hearing on Compact of Free Association Amendments Act.”
 

I know, the title doesn’t invite enthusiasm, but this two-month-old, one-hour and 40-minute clip has been viewed more than 7,100 times on YouTube, so those in the know recognise its importance. In fact, it has enormous implications for the US-China rivalry in the Pacific that we are rarely, if ever, told about.

If you think you know Washington’s real positions on such matters as exclusive economic zones (EEZs), freedom of navigation (FON) in open or international waters, and territorial waters - all being definitions crucial to what we are told about China’s expansionism in the South and East China seas - you really should watch this clip.

COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2023--read the bill

First, what are the Compacts of Free Association? Second, why has the White House rolled out the red carpet with President Joe Biden personally meeting leaders of the Pacific Island states this week?

These tiny islands have been routinely ignored for decades until China supposedly started spreading its influence in the region, for example, by making the security deal with the Solomon Islands.

The Pacific island summit this week includes Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, French Polynesia, Kiribati, Nauru, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Samoa, Tonga, and Tuvalu.

But the compact refers specifically to the strategic, defence and economic pacts which Washington has long made with the Marshall Islands, Palau and Micronesia. While those pacts don’t expire per se but may be terminated by the parties, most US economic aid and subsidies will expire on Saturday while others will end next year. Palau and Micronesia have already renewed their pacts; the Marshall Islands is expected to be on board with a sweetened deal from Washington.

Manila and Washington work together to deter China with military upgrades
23 Sep 2023

Hence there was the need for the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act 2023. The Solomon Islands did not take part in this week’s summit.

 
All very well. With the Chinese closing in, why shouldn’t Washington step up aid and military assistance to counter Chinese influence? Well, it’s much more than that.
 

While notionally sovereign, those island states have been de facto US overseas colonies, as the pacts allow the US to take full defence and strategic control of their lands, seas and air.

As it turns out, and the video clip makes clear, the US now considers the new pact as entitling it to control almost the entire central Pacific by virtue of its control of the three island states’ EEZs. This amounts to a new interpretation which allows the US the right to deny other countries or entities from sailing into those zones.

(Go to 49 min, 30 seconds on the YouTube clip for a very clear and concise map of the full extent of maritime control the US is asserting with the new pacts.)

Thus Republican senator and ranking committee member John Barrasso said: “The compacts provide us with strategic denial rights. This means the United States has the exclusive authority to make national security decisions on the lands and waters surrounding the freely associated states. The space outlined on this map in orange is the exclusive economic zones of the freely associated states … It’s nearly as large as the continental United States.”

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence Siddharth Mohandas then elaborated on Barrasso’s remarks: “The combined maritime expanse covered by the freely associated states is equivalent to the size of the continental United States, in a key strategic terrain in the Indo-Pacific. What we get from Title 3 of the compact are two fundamental things: One is unfettered access, access to bases and overflight, which allow freedom of operations in the area. And the second is exclusive access: we have the ability to deny foreign military access and their ability to operate in the exclusive economic zones of the freely associated states. This is critically important at a time when China is increasingly active and aggressive throughout the Indo-Pacific.”

While Taiwan falls within the first island chain of attack or containment against mainland China, the whole of the central Pacific, not just the second island chain within it, is now effectively a US sphere of influence.

Joseph Yuosang Yun, the US special presidential envoy for compact negotiations, made this point at a separate presentation at the Washington-based Hudson Institute in April.

He explained that the Freely Associated States lying between Hawaii and the Philippines are crucial to the United States remaining a Pacific power.

“[The Marshall Islands, Palau and Micronesia] are the second island chain in defining its historic territorial claims across the Pacific,” Yun said. “Anyone with ambitions wants to control [the] waterways.”

Well, he would say that, wouldn’t he? In great power rivalry, none of those claims are particularly outrageous; indeed, rather quite understandable. However, the US has claimed both the legal and moral high grounds with respect to EEZs and freedom of navigation, including its naval access, through China’s EEZs. The argument is that anyone can, by international law, sail through anyone else’s EEZs.

new article in Foreign Policy in Focus explains this point quite well: “In fact, US officials have long taken the position that exclusive economic zones must remain open to navigation. Across the world, they have promoted ‘freedom of navigation’, which they have presented as the freedom of ships to sail the world’s oceans and waterways wherever the law allows, including in the exclusive economic zones of other countries.”

Just to clarify some terms, sovereign or territorial waters, the maritime equivalent of sovereign land, extend from shores to 12 nautical miles. From there out to 200 nautical miles is what people usually call EEZs.

As the same article has pointed out, using a country’s navy and/or those of its allies, as the US has frequently done, to sail through others’ EEZs to demonstrate FON is not only provocative, but in breach of international law.

As stated in Articles 87 and 88 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, “the high seas shall be reserved for peaceful purposes”.

Of course, the US position is to have its cake and eat it too. It has never ratified the UN convention, yet claims it fully supports it and has unscrupulously cited it against others who have signed and ratified it when it suits Washington’s purpose.

But with the renewed Pacific island pacts, it has gone beyond the “having your cake and eat it too” hypocrisy; it is claiming the exclusive right of denial to access by other countries’ navies and possibly other maritime assets to the island states’ EEZs, a right Washington has denied to others. And yet, it claims those island states are “sovereign”!

Moreover, as the Foreign Policy in Focus has observed, the new expansive interpretation of EEZ strategic control contradicts the US government’s own previous interpretation. According to the US General Accounting Office (GAO) in 2002, the pacts only allow US exclusive defence and strategic control of the island states’ territorial land and waters, but not EEZs.

Of course, those of us who have made a serious study of the history of US foreign policy would not at all be surprised. US self-defined exceptionalism has always been a case of “do as I say not as I do”.

But when it comes to the fate of the region if not the world, this stealthy US exceptionalism and expansionism need to be broadcast as widely as possible so the world knows the terrible danger to which Washington’s rivalry with China is exposing all of us.

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Paramilitary Forces Near Suwalki Gap, NATO’s Achilles Heel

 

Paramilitary Forces Near Suwalki Gap, NATO’s Achilles Heel



Suwalki Gap

Some of the Wagner mercenaries who recently relocated to Belarus have moved towards the Suwałki Gap – a strategically important choke point on the border between Poland and Lithuania – says Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.

He warns that fighters from the Russian private military group will be used to mount “further hybrid attacks” against Poland by helping migrants illegally cross into Polish territory and even themselves entering disguised as such migrants.

“For almost two years, we have been dealing with a permanent attack on the Polish border,” said Morawiecki today. “This year alone there have been over 16,000 attempts to cross the border illegally by immigrants, whom Lukashenko and Putin [the presidents of Belarus and Russia] are trying to push over the Polish border.”

“But now the situation is becoming even more dangerous: we have information that over 100 mercenaries from the Wagner Group have moved towards the Suwałki Gap, near Grodno in Belarus,” he added, speaking during a press conference at an arms manufacturer in Silesia.

“This is certainly a step towards a further hybrid attack on Polish territory,” said the prime minister. “They will probably be disguised as Belarusian border guards and will help illegal immigrants to get to Polish territory, to destabilise Poland.”

“But presumably, they will also try to infiltrate Poland, pretending to be illegal immigrants, they will try to pass through, penetrate, and this creates additional risks,” he warned.

 

Yesterday, Ukraine’s National Resistance Centre reported that 100 Wagner fighters had moved towards the Suwałki Gap with the aim of “organising provocations on the border of Belarus with Poland and Lithuania”. It noted that the mercenaries “have experience in smuggling and transporting illegal migrants”.

Lithuania’s deputy interior minister, Arnoldas Abramavičius, announced that the presence of Wagner forces could lead both his country and Poland to entirely close their borders with Belarus.

“We will not let any little green men run around here,” said Polish interior minister Mariusz Kamiński on Thursday during a visit to the border, referring to the soldiers used by Russia during its occupation of Crimea in 2014. “Such a situation will never happen. We are well organised and prepared.”

 

The Suwałki Gap, which lies between the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad and Belarus, a close Kremlin ally, has long been seen as a potential weak point for NATO in a war with Russia. After Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine last year, some media outlets began calling it “the most dangerous place on earth”.

Since the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine, Poland has strengthened security along its borders with both Kaliningrad and Belarus.

In the latter case, it had started to do so even earlier, after Belarus began orchestrating a crisis in mid-2021 that has seen thousands of migrants and asylum seekers – mainly from the Middle East, Asia and Africa – try to cross into the EU.

 

After Minsk offered sanctuary to Wagner fighters and their leader Yevgeny Prigozhin following their short-lived rebellion in June, Poland responded by sending additional forces to the border with Belarus.

Earlier this month, Wagner mercenaries began holding training exercises with Belarusian special forces near the border, though Warsaw said at the time that there was no reason to “panic”.

However, in further remarks today at a “family picnic” organised by the government, Morawiecki warned that “Wagner’s troops are ruthless criminals, often recruited from prisons”.

“They are ruthless killers, as they have shown in Africa, in the Middle East, in Ukraine,” he continued, quoted by news service 300Polityka. “Now they are on the borders of Poland.”

 

“Imagine, for a moment, that PO [the main opposition party] had somehow won the 2019 elections,” said the prime minister. That would mean Poland having an “unguarded border” and PO leader Donald “Tusk waiting for instructions from Berlin on what to do”.

By contrast, the current Law and Justice (PiS) government is “defending the whole border with determination precisely so that illegal immigrants do not flood Poland”, added Morawiecki.

Recent weeks have seen PiS and PO clash over the issue of migration amid campaigning for this autumn’s parliamentary elections. Each has accused the other of supporting policies to allow large numbers of Muslim migrants into the country.

During his remarks today at the arms manufacturer, Morawiecki also accused Tusk of being too friendly towards Russia and Germany during his time as prime minister. The PO leader is “a very dangerous man”, said Morawiecki, quoted by the Polish Press Agency (PAP).

Notes from Poland is run by a small editorial team and published by an independent, non-profit foundation that is funded through donations from our readers.

Thursday, June 1, 2023

Mahathir Mohamad takes West to task over Russia, China in FCCJ appearance

 

Mahathir Mohamad takes West to task over Russia, China in FCCJ

appearance

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad speaks at the FCCJ in May. Photo: ©Yoshikazu Tsuno

In his most recent press conference at the FCCJ on May 24, the former Malaysian prime minister, Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad, delivered a strong indictment of what he suggested is the unjustified presumption by Western nations that they are best qualified to run the world.

Despite being 97, he gave little impression of slowing down, offering penetrating intellectual analysis, up-to-date knowledge of global affairs and fluent delivery. All of his faculties were still in place and matched those of a much younger man.

He has also retained his ability to deliver acerbic comments, such as when he suggested that Europeans “like going to war to settle quarrels”, while Southeast Asians generally prefer negotiation, and when he attacked the presumption of certain Western powers in seeking to set global priorities and agendas.

Mahathir, who was in Tokyo to speak at a Nikkei Asia regional conference on Asia, drew quite a large crowd at the FCCJ and attracted many questions from the floor.

Mahathir, Malaysia’s prime minister from 1981 to 2003, and then again from 2018 to 2020, responded to questions with forthrightness, fluency, politeness and political maturity, confirming his reputation as an elder statesman of Asia. They are qualities that stand in stark contrast to the style and actions of many contemporary national leaders.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad speaks at the FCCJ in May. Photo: ©Yoshikazu Tsuno

Mahathir called for a “new model” of government prevent a third world war and, possibly, the destruction of the planet and its people. The global population has now reached 8 billion, but this has not been matched by people’s ability to govern themselves, he said.

Migration is creating multiracial societies that create economic and social strains, but governments have not learned to deal with population growth and diversity, he said. Tribalism, he said, had given rise to nation states and nationalism, but not globalism, in government.

As a result, a handful of major powers has assumed the right to govern globally and is “attempting to politicize all issues” or even to “bring about regime change” in countries that do not agree with their views, he said, adding that those major powers seek to run the world without consultation”.

Mahathir called for a “world government” elected from all countries, as well as a similarly democratic agreement on laws governing international (but not always domestic) aspects of government behaviour.

“We have to work at it, slowly, and learn to act as if we are one country,” he said. “We need a slow merging of nations, in the same way that we went from tribalism to becoming nation states.”

He held up the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations as a model of a group of nations that have successfully cooperated on external affairs and avoided overt conflict and war for many decades.

Mahathir contrasted this with the accelerating drift toward economic or even military confrontation among the world's great powers, and the growing risk that many smaller nations could be dragged into conflicts. “Going to war is not a solution,” he said, adding that the only viable option is sincere and continued negotiation.

There is “powerful pressure now to get the rest of the world to oppose Russia and China,” but this should be resisted, Mahhathir said, before offering an analysis of the factors behind the war in Ukraine and tensions surrounding Taiwan.

After the 1965 Warsaw Pact between the Soviet Union and seven other Eastern Bloc countries was dismantled, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) should have been dismantled too, he said. Instead, Western powers led by the United States have sought to get former Warsaw Pact nations to join NATO. This pressure extended to Ukraine, and “Russia responded by attacking Ukraine”, he said.

Asia, by contrast, is “not at war”, he said, adding that Taiwan was formerly "quite friendly” with China until other tensions were stoked.

“We should not allow ourselves to be manipulated by great powers,” he said in tones reminiscent of the 1980s when, as prime minister of Malaysia, he called for the formation of an East Asian Economic Caucus (EAEC) excluding the U.S., only to have Washington (and Japan) reject the proposal.

Since then, various organizations have been formed to include both Asian and Western countries. They were supposed to bring together countries with common interests, but Western powers have used these forums to “take decisions that favour themselves”, Mahathir said.

“A meeting of like-minded countries is like talking to yourself,” he added. “America is telling everyone to please confront China, but if neutral countries such as Malaysia can be friendly with China, why can’t others? We should slowly reduce the enmity we have with other countries.”


Anthony Rowley is a columnist and contributor for the South China Morning Post.

Followers